Superior Court Issues a Sweeping Decision

On April 17, 2012, the of handed down a sweeping decision that broadly interprets under Section 8371. In Berg v. Nationwide Mutual Company, the Superior Court emphasized that “” in Pennsylvania is actually quite broad, and it found that evidence that the insurance company paid defense counsel just under $1 million dollars was evidence that supported .

In Berg, the Plaintiffs alleged that Nationwide had “repaired” a vehicle, knowing that it still had structural damage. The Superior Court also said that Plaintiffs alleged that Nationwide paid “$922,654.25 to defend the , allegedly pursuant to a documented litigation strategy to deter the filing of small value claims.” The trial court had granted Nationwide’s motion for a directed verdict. It relied on longstanding, but narrow, definitions of bad faith from early cases.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Protected with IP Blacklist CloudIP Blacklist Cloud

If you need more information, email or call 314-993-2266.

Log In

Create an account